Caitlin Lengthy, founder and CEO of Custodia Financial institution, has criticized the US Federal Reserve for quietly sustaining a key anti-crypto coverage that favors big-bank-issued stablecoins, regardless of enjoyable crypto partnership guidelines for banks.
In an April 27 thread on X, Lengthy defined that whereas the Fed recently rescinded four prior crypto guidelines, it left intact a Jan. 27, 2023, assertion issued in coordination with the Biden administration.
The steering, based on Lengthy, blocks banks from partaking immediately with crypto property and prohibits them from issuing stablecoins on permissionless blockchains.
“THE FED HAS MAINTAINED A REGULATORY PREFERENCE FOR PERMISSIONED STABLECOINS (ie, big-bank variations),” Lengthy said.
She warned that this transfer provides conventional monetary establishments a “head begin” in launching non-public stablecoins whereas the broader market waits for stablecoin laws to go by Congress.
Lengthy urges Congress to go stablecoin invoice
Lengthy famous that after a federal stablecoin invoice turns into regulation, it might override the Fed’s stance. “Congress ought to hurry up,” she urged.
Past stablecoins, Lengthy identified how the Fed’s coverage hampers banks from taking part in crypto markets as principals, stopping them from market-making in property like Bitcoin (BTC), Ether (ETH) or Solana (SOL).
Associated: US banks are ‘free to begin supporting Bitcoin’
She additionally famous operational challenges for banks trying to provide crypto custody companies, significantly round overlaying gasoline charges for onchain transactions — a typical follow for crypto custodians however restricted below present Fed guidelines.
Summing up her considerations, Lengthy argued that the Fed’s resolution retains “sand within the wheels” of banks getting into crypto custody, whereas concurrently advancing permissioned stablecoins backed by main monetary establishments.
“The Fed undoubtedly gained on PR spin–its press launch listed a protracted listing of steering it rescindedbut omitted ANY point out of the steering it saved. That duped *so much* of sensible individuals, understandably,” she wrote.
Associated: Fed’s Powell reasserts support for stablecoin legislation
Senator Lummis calls Fed’s transfer as “lip service”
Senator Cynthia Lummis, a vocal supporter of digital property, additionally condemned the Fed’s move as mere “lip service,” signaling potential legislative pushback within the close to future.
Lummis talked about the Fed’s coverage assertion in Part 9(13), which hasn’t been withdrawn, stating that Bitcoin and digital property are thought-about “unsafe and unsound.”
Nevertheless, different crypto executives praised the Fed’s announcement as a optimistic improvement for the business. Technique’s Michael Saylor said in an April 25 X put up that the Fed’s transfer signifies that “banks are actually free to start supporting Bitcoin.”
Journal: Financial nihilism in crypto is over — It’s time to dream big again